Something to think about:
The All Star game should not “count.” The concept is ridiculous. Why should a game count if:
- fans vote for the starters -- 25 times for every email address they can create
- the managers pick almost all the rest -- um, even though some players get contractual bonuses for making the team
- fans then vote again to pick the last player – a player who, a la Nick Swisher can campaign to make the team.
- every team has to be represented even though they may not have a legitimate all star
- a retired manager can manage
- players can opt out because of “injury”
- etc.
If
alternating home field advantage is too logical, why not let interleague play
(another dopey idea) determine home field advantage? Whichever league has the better overall record
would get the home field advantage. After
all, interleague games ALL actually count.
Players try to win becaue they are real games that really count. These
games actually have a bearing on what
teams get into that World Series.
Anyone
who thinks that the commissioner did this “the road to October starts here”
thing for any other reason than caving in to outraged fans and media when the
2002 “Midsummer Classic” ended in a tie (11 innings couldn’t satisfy people) probably
thinks that fans and media have a right to run baseball. Hmmm – as far as this instance, apparently
they do.
More
on my thoughts on media in another post.
For now, I just hope that no one who might frighten the commissioner starts
suggesting the home run derby count as
well.
I’ll
get into interleague play and the designated hitter another time – but anyone who argues against it for the sake of
tradition had better also be arguing
against the All Star game counting and interleague play.
No comments:
Post a Comment